Proclamation of great news

Ezekiel 33:7 "So you, son of man: I have made you a watchman for the house of Israel; therefore you shall hear a word from My mouth and warn them for Me."

The Lord called me back in 1985 to discern the wicked workings of the Devil and his minions. To call out warnings. To proclaim the preparation for battle. To speak the Word of YHWH. It is not my position to elaborate on or belabor the message given. I will proclaim the Lord's warning and allow the Holy Spirit to work out the meaning in your heart.
 

Justice for life? Maybe not.

"The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behavior, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services a Compensation which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office." US Constitution, Article 3, Section 1. http://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A3Sec1.html


Now here is a good example of most citizens not knowing what the Constitution says. Justices are not appointed to the Supreme Court for life, nor for any lower court. It is simply not stated thus.

But it brings up a dilemma: because what in the world did our Founding Fathers mean by "good Behavior"? With so much discussion on what the 2nd Amendment means, shouldn't there be even more discussion on what constitutes "good behavior" in a judge?

So if a justice gets drunk and falls asleep during a State of the Union address, is that justice upholding a standard of good behavior befitting a justice of the Supreme Court of the United States?

Or does it mean that if a justice is ruling on how they wish the Constitution was written and not the actual language in the Constitution is that justice acting in "good behavior"? Is judicial activism unconstitutional behavior un-befitting a Supreme Court Justice?

And if the justice has used poor judgement and a President can use said behavior to hold a justice's decision hostage should the justice not be removed?

What is a life worth?

We live in a world that is living in squalor. Hatred and destruction are everywhere we look; from the Middle East where ISIS is destroying monuments, to the Southern United States, where the call is to exhume bodies of the “intolerant”, and erase all signs of our culture because of its perceived history.

We see the awful things happening around us, but don't want to admit that the reason things are so awful is because of us, and yet the simple truth is that we don't NEED to be awful. Human life is so valuable that Almighty God had to experience extreme suffering and torment of soul to show us a better path. Christianity has the solution, but the sinners in the world cannot see the simple truth.

Others religions, such as Islam, do not confer value upon human life. In fact, a video was making its way around the Internet in which a Muslim woman hoped her son would become a suicide bomber and take the very lives of the same Jewish people that had just saved his infant-life through a complicated surgery because the Muslim people do not regard human life.

In our own culture, the cult of abortion is removing the value from human life. By denying its very significance from conception, we are denying the merit of human life throughout the life span.

The current din coming from the homosexual crowd calling Christianity hateful is due to the simple fact that sinful people cannot separate their sin from their identity. It is easy to see when they continue to demand that we accept them as having been “born this way,” while denying that being born homosexual is contrary to their belief in the theory of natural selection.

For Christianity the world is clearly definable, sin is the nature of man, and yet man is redeemable. Man has greater worth and must somehow see that his sin is the monstrosity that is blinding himself to the truth; the Truth that they are truly priceless.

A eye-surgeon knows that removing the cataract will be a painful surgery with a lengthy recuperation, but the end product is worth the process. To leave someone blind and pitiful is cold-blooded, not the other way around. So in essence, despite the hue and cry that Christians are being mean for calling the world out on its sin, they are really trying to clear the mud away from the sinners eyes so he can see how truly valuable he is in the eyes of the Almighty Creator.

Naturally, Humanity is NOT gay!

Here is my take on gay lifestyle:

In the Middle East it is acceptable to screw animals: camels, sheep, goats and donkeys. The Muslim people see nothing wrong with this practice, but we think it is deplorable and not acceptable.

Here in the US, we have a population that thinks it is acceptable to screw a member of the same sex. The Muslims think it is deplorable and, in fact, will stone, or hang, or behead or throw the person from a high building to kill them.

But simply observe how the human body looks. The man has a penis, and the woman a vagina, and these two apparatuses fit together perfectly. This is the natural design of humanity. The design of the human body was naturally meant for the use of these body parts in this fashion, anything else could be considered unnatural.

So for a human to have sex with a member of the same sex is UNNATURAL.  I can see it, and even those who think homosexuality is okay can see it. It is not natural and I should not be made to claim that I do not have a problem with it.

Another take:

Today’s question is: Why does the world say that an unchosen sexual disposition isn’t changeable, but an unchosen gender is? http://www.moorematt.org/qa-series-why-does-the-world-say-that-an-unchosen-sexual-disposition-isnt-changeable-but-an-unchosen-gender-is-day-2/

Here the writer uses the terms unchosen to describe homosexual disposition. I agree it is a choice.... Here's why:

There is nothing natural about desiring a member of the same gender (see above). So when one begins to have those desires a choice is made....... to either accept the desires or to deny them
and choose to accept the natural choice. Only when you make the choice to accept same sex attraction as your predilection do you begin to act on it. The desires may be real or not (nothing has yet been determined psychologically), but the actions that lead to the homosexual lifestyle are clearly a CHOICE.

Homosexuality is not something we are born with....... but your gender is something you are born with.
The hypocrisy of demanding that we accept homosexuality as unchangeable and gender as changeable is laughable. Gender is natural, homosexual inclination is NOT natural.

If I can look at you, another human being, and say you are white, or black, or male or female.....but not say you are gay, then it is NOT NATURAL, it is not something you were born with. Demanding I say otherwise is simply being a bully.

What is tolerance?

WE are told that religion is the scourge of the world, that all conflict and hatred is bound up in man's inability to come to terms with everyone inherent worth and the desire to make others feel less moral than we.  Yet, in the world that we live, many claim the badge of tolerance and therefore they feel that they are morally superior. They accept everyone as they are, they make no judgement, they do not discriminate, they love everyone. EXCEPT.......

They really don't.

There are many examples of this:

• Sarah Palin and her Down's Syndrome son Trig have been attacked mercilessly by the left using terns that they themselves say are hateful (ie. C**t, Retard, Imbecile, Batshit Crazy, Bit*h, etc)
• Rush Limbaugh is a large target because he isn't afraid to tell the truth about what is going on in Washington DC and he must be stopped, even if they need to tell lies about him to get his voice off the air.
• The TEA Party movement is called traitors and terrorists, because they simply want the size of government to shrink, they want American citizens to be responsible citizens, they want illegal aliens to not be given handout that have been paid for by the Americans who are now being told they will never see any benefits from their years of sacrifice.
• The military are ridiculed by those who have never offered a single eyelash to defend our way of life, nor protect another human life (and that includes pre-born life).

One begins to wonder how those so intolerant of so much can call themselves tolerant?

Because the term does not mean what it originally meant.  Dictionary.com defines tolerance as: 

1. a fair, objective, and permissive attitude toward those whose opinions, beliefs, practices, racial or ethnic origins, etc., differ from one's own; freedom from bigotry.
2. a fair, objective, and permissive attitude toward opinions, beliefs, and practices that differ from one's own.
3. interest in and concern for ideas, opinions, practices, etc., foreign to one's own; a liberal, undogmatic viewpoint.

But as we are now seeing, there is very little acceptance of opinions that differ from one's own.
Instead the term has been redefined (a well-used tactic of the left) to mean the complete opposite of its original meaning.  The self-righteous left is now using this term to mean ..........................................

The intolerance of intolerance.

Let that sink in............... Instead of demanding that other's be respected for their inherent worth, we are told that some people are to be more respected and many people are to be disrespected because they supposedly are disrespecting others.  The Moral High Ground is to hate others because they hate.


Doesn't this sound a little like two wrongs being used to try to make right?

I, being a self-righteous elitist get to define who the haters are and then I get to hate them, and not simply with hate, but with

HATE!!!  









The world  has become a more dangerous place because Tolerance has reared its ugly head in our world.  When those who like to feel that they love everyone, that they are accepting of others', and non-judgemental become the arbiters of the terminology this is the ugly turn it can take. Now Hating has become okay as long as you are hating those who you believe, even without cause, are hating.

Those who claim to speak for the oppressed have now become the oppressors by trying to remove the voice of those they disagree with. It isn't even about helping the oppressed anymore, it has become about: hurting and destroying anyone who thinks differently than you.


Tolerance = Bigotry    How do we un-weave this tangled web of lies and deceit?

A shout out to Alfonzo Rachel for clarifying this for me.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hoU1lMxZqU&feature=youtu.be

Hierarchy of Significance

Atheists Borrow from Christian Doctrine

Evolution borrows Christian Dogma

If evolution is the path through which life, and indeed human life, resides on this planet than there are many problems with how humanity is treated.

Evolution teaches that man is nothing more than an animal. It resides at the top of the food chain simply because it has become intelligent by means of natural selection. Evolutionists believe that man is a product of the earth, and a product of the universe, that there is nothing inherently majestic or special about human beings in the cosmos.

If man is no different that the animals, than his access to the resources of the planet should be no more restricted than an ant, or a duck.  As the animals all have equal access to the resources of the planet, than man being nothing more than an animal should also have the same access without restrictions.  There is no evolutionary reason for man to not build whatever he wishes where ever he wishes anytime he wishes. No reason for an animal to restrict  its use of the resources of the planet that spawned its very existence.

Environmentalists want man to be restricted from using some resources because it "harms" the environment. That is not logical, because if man was made from the same materials as the earth was made, than by not allowing him free use of all the resources is the same as genocide, and has potential to lead to extinction of the species.  In theory the planet spawned all life spontaneously, than all life can be said to be a product of the planet, and human use of the planet is no different than a plant using decayed waste as a nutrition source. So where did the idea come from that man is the master of the planet and needs to care for the environment?

The idea that man is higher than the animals, and that he needs to subdue the planet and be its steward comes from the Bible. Many environmentalist and atheists are borrowing from Christianity to make their claim.  The only possible reason for man to be restricted from complete access to Earth in its entirety is because the Bible teaches that man was made higher than all other animals and was commanded to rule over the whole planet and cultivate it.

So there is absolutely zero evolutionary reason for man to not:

Drill oil in the Gulf of Mexico
Cut down forests
Build in wetland areas
Burn coal and fill the skies with smoke
Ignore a minor temperature change
Create chemicals that kill insects
Put animals in cages
Use animals for experimental purposes
Drive massive vehicles
Create antibiotics that kill pathogens
Have intercourse with animals
Fish, hunt, or destroy other species, even to the point of extinction
Clone, or genetically modify any life form
Enslave other races, genders, species



No evolutionary reason at all!


The only argument that man should not do these things is because the earth was created perfect and man was put in charge of taking care of the planet by the Creator of the planet.  Your welcome!